Feedback Form
   
Add to Google
Space Sunshade to Reduce Global Warming Space Sunshade to Reduce Global Warming
Wednesday, November 26, 2008 - Janice Karin
Home >> Picture Of The Day >> Green Technology
  Peralink
Space Sunshade to Reduce Global Warming
Related Pictures
SunHopes – Balloon Based Solar Energy
Honda Insight
Researchers at the University of Arizona are developing an ambitious space sunshade system that could reduce the sunlight reaching the Earth by 2%, enough to balance the heating effects of the increasing amounts of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Composed of trillions of miniature spacecraft, this sunshade would form a cylindrical cloud with half of the diameter of the Earth and a length about ten times longer than that located in an L1 orbit. Anything orbiting at this location remains interposed directly between the Sun and the Earth, allowing the shade to constantly filter the sunlight reaching our planet.
Each individual piece of the sunshade would be made from a thin film pierced with holes imprinted onto a one micron thick plate of glass, be a mere two feet in diameter, and weigh only a gram. Microelectromechanical (MEMS) mirrors would act as tiny sails, aiding in positioning and ensuring that the system as a whole filters out the projected levels of sunlight. The L1 orbit is not completely stable, so minor corrections controlled by these mirrors will be necessary to maintain the sunshade over time.
 
Despite the small size and weight of the individual components, the sunshade as a whole adds up to approximately 20 million tons; placing that much mass in orbit using traditional chemical rockets would be prohibitively expensive, so alternative launch methods are a necessary element of the project as a whole.
 
Project director Roger Angel proposes to solve the launch problem by using electromagnetic rocket launchers developed at Sandia National Laboratory in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Even with 20 such launchers, it would take ten years of launching stacks of rockets every five minutes to fully deploy the sunshade system. Once launched out of Earth orbit, the stacks of components would be steered to L1 orbit using solar powered ion propulsion, the same electromagnetic propulsion method currently used in several NASA and ESA projects.
 
Angel estimates such a sunshade system could be ready for deployment in as little as 25 years and that careful manufacturing and materials selection could grant each component a 50 year workable lifetime. The shade would be expensive, but presents a viable method of cooling the Earth's temperature if other attempts to mitigate global warming fail or are not sufficient.
 
TFOT has reported on other innovative technologies designed to reduce greenhouse gases and global warming, including bacteria that produce hydrogen that can be used as a source of clean power, a new material that can reduce the carbon dioxide emissions from power plants, and yachts that spray salty sea water into the air to increase the reflexivity of clouds so they reflect more sunlight back into space.
 
More information about the space sunshade can be found on an early press release by the University of Arizona and in a follow-up piece in the school's newspaper, the Daily Wildcat. You can also learn more about the head researcher Roger Angel at his College of Optical Sciences faculty page found here.

Other Articles 2008 in Science, Medicine and Space 2008 in Science, Medicine and Space 2007 In Science, Medicine and Space 2007 In Science, Medicine and Space

Related News Cheap Solar Electricity? Cheap Solar Electricity? New Generation of Solar Cells New Generation of Solar Cells

Other Columns Do we Think they Think? Do we Think they Think? Jet Engine Development in Germany Jet Engine Development in Germany



Comments & Replies (5)
Brilliant   (11/26/08 - 17:09 - by Ben)
Just what we need, millions of pieces of junk it the atmosphere that
cost billions of dollars, takes a fifth of their shelf life to install
and crowds the area around our planet to inhibit space launches and
satellites. it would be much faster and cheaper to find an earthborn
solution to global warming. There would also be much smaller risk of
catasrophic failure.
Nonesense   (11/26/08 - 23:37 - by R James)
What a load of garbage. How much would this cost, and what better use
is there. The first thing we need to do is stabilize population
numbers. With India's planned growth (exceeding China) all else
becomes of little significance. Then we need more efficient systems.
Oh, one more thing - I'd like just one piece of evidence that
increased CO2 is increasing temperature - all evidence to date shows
that there is no effect from CO2 increases - look at the past 10 years
- 5% increased CO2, and decreased temperature.
idiots, keep your mouths SHUT   (11/27/08 - 20:22 - by Scorpion)
The comments by Ben and R James demonstrate why the human race is
doomed. First of all, Ben, the shades will be located in orbit L1,
which is A MILLION MILES away, not 'in the atmosphere' or 'inhibiting
space launches'. And R James says that there is 'no effect from CO2
increases'. We can tell its human-caused CO2 measuring the C12 and C14
isotopes (natural CO2 is different). I burn up when I see these blogs,
and I think our grandkids will too - literally. They should have their
comments put in a time capsule. Better yet, separate the deniers of
Global Warming from those who are working to prevent it, like the
author. The descendants of the deniers should be forced to live on
this soon-to-be burnt out planet, while those who worked to prevent it
should be allowed to live in space colonies. Yes, deploying this
system will be costly, but can you tell me how much it will cost to
relocate NYC, LA, SF, Miami, Shanghai, HK, Mumbai, etc. when the
icecaps melt and they are flooded!!?
So back it up with science   (11/28/08 - 0:01 - by R James)
Scorpion - so tell us how measurement of C12 and C14 proves that
increased CO2 causes global warming. Note that I haven't questioned
that human activity is contributing to the increased CO2 level.
Science tells us that increased CO2 has a logrithmic effect on
temperature increase, and that we have already experienced most of
this at current levels. As I said before, 5% CO2 increase, yet
temperature decreasing. It makes you wonder. Sea levels are rising -
they've been doing this for the past 20,000 years, though slower in
recent times. I guess it was those big power stations they built
20,000 years ago. Sorry to "burn you up", but still waiting for some
science to back up the CO2/heating hypothesis.
Utter rubbish   (11/28/08 - 14:25 - by Dr A Burns)
Scorpion is partly correct though ... the human race is doomed because
of the stupidity of such research and comments like his. C12/C14
ratios show that just 2% of the tiny amount of CO2 in the atmosphere
derives from fossil fuels.
There is no evidence whatsoever that man's
CO2 is causing global warming ... and ooops, the globe has been
cooling for the past decade anyway !

Add a New Comment
Your name:   0/20
Subject:  0/30
Your Comment:  0/999
Type the following letters: Visual CAPTCHA
Please keep your comments related to the above item's topic. TFOT reserves the right to delete any unrelated comment without notice.

Picture Of The Day
Micro-Flying Robot
Micro-Flying Robot

Video
Hottest Water on Earth
Hottest Water on Earth

Site Of The Week
Patently Silly
Patently Silly

Personal Column
Jet Engine Development in Germany
Dr. Daniel Uziel
Jet Engine Development in Germany
Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Advertise With Us | Site Profile
Copyright © 2007 The Future of Things. All rights reserved.